There are 139 dance shots in the film. 111 are Natalie Portman untouched. 28 are her dance double Sarah Lane…The shots that feature the double are wide shots and rarely play for longer than one second. There are two complicated longer dance sequences that we used face replacement.
- Darren Aronfsky
I was going to write a whole entry about Aronofsky’s misogyny both in stuff he has said and how he presents and films women onscreen. Like when he said Black Swan isn’t misogynistic with the same breath that he uttered: “That whole scene with Natalie when [Vincent Cassel] tells her to go touch herself, it’s really not that out of line.” Or when he said, “I wish I could be as manipulative as Thomas Leroy in the film.” And then I was going to maybe delve a little into the fact that I think he’s a voyeur dressed in an artist’s clothing - that he relishes in documenting abject human misery (particularly the sexual misery of women) obscured by a patina of faux-realism and with all the empathy and compassion of Ted Bundy. But then I thought, why? It would simply suffice to present the indisputable fact that he’s an unethical liar who purposefully obscured the work of a real ballerina to aggrandize his star who already had the oscar anyway.
So here are the facts as you can see in the pictures, not the “facts” that Aronofsky presented to smear Sarah Lane. There were minimum 4 cases of actual face replacement that were shown in various fx reels. And as you can see by the two stills, there was some majorly weird ass shit going on with her face which looks a hell of a lot like face replacement and at the minimum “touching” (not “kind touching” as in that movie with J.Lov.Hew unfortunately). The kicker? On the official dvd extras they only put two instances of face replacement which is funny because that’s also the random and nonsensical number Aronofsky chose, wonder why? Maybe he knew that was the number he could get away with…
The point of this: Aronofsky is a liar and you might like his movies and you may disagree that his quotes reveal an inner misogynist and you might not give a flying fuck who did what dancing in the movie, but you can’t deny that he lied and that he was unethical - that he purposefully obscured the work of an artist and much more powerless person in order to gain accolades for his lead actress and consequently himself. And it sure didn’t hurt his bank account either.
Size of haterade chalice required: None. His girlfriend (and mother of his child) already left him for James Bond.

